RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05203
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) of 25 May 2014 be
corrected based on it being erroneously updated as a result of
his acceptance of Tuition Assistance.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Upon graduating and being commissioned from the Air Force
Academy on 28 May 2008, he incurred a five year ADSC making his
ADSC 27 May 2013. AFPC inadvertently changed his ADSC to 9
March 2015. AFPC corrected the mistake. On 29 May 2012, he
completed a masters class using tuition assistance and his ADSC
was changed to 26 May 2014.
In support of the applicants appeal, he provides a personal
statement, documents extracted from his records and other
documentation.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the grade of captain
effective and with a date of rank of 28 May 2012.
The applicant digitally signed AF Form 1227, Authority for
Tuition Assistance Education Services Program, on 30 March
2012. The form reflects the applicant enrolled in a business
course at American Military University. The total tuition for
the class was $975.00; total Government cost was $750.00; total
student cost was $225.00. He signed the form indicating his
eligibility, complete understanding and acceptance of the two-
year ADSC.
The applicants ADSC date is 26 May 2014.
________________________________________________________________
_
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AF/A1DL recommends denial. A1DL states the ADSC date was
correctly calculated. The action taken was IAW AFI 36-2306,
Voluntary Education, as the applicant electronically signed the
AF Form 1227, Authority for Tuition Assistance Education
Services Program, indicating his eligibility, complete
understanding, and acceptance of the two-year ADSC.
The A1DL complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant states A1DL did not address the fact that although
the tuition assistance was accepted with the class completed by
May 2012 - his ADSC was much further out than it should have
been. When he accepted the tuition assistance - AFPC
inadvertently changed his ADSC to reflect 9 March 2015. AFPC
recognized their mistake and corrected the ADSC to reflect May
2014 due to the tuition assistance. However, it should have
been changed to reflect May 2013. AFPC has on multiple
occasions inadvertently reset his ADSC forward to May 2015
because of automatic updates. He further states he spoke with
personnel at A1DL who indicated he was told to only look at the
tuition assistance portion, not the entire case and it was not
his place to give a recommendation on anything other than data
pertaining to tuition assistance. He is willing to repay the
$700.00 the Air Force gave him for the class which would
rightfully return his ADSC to 27 May 2013 and make him
potentially eligible for the 2013 Combat Skills Retention Bonus
(CSRB).
The applicants complete response is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
_
ADDITIONAL REVIEW AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AF/A1DL recommends denial. A1DL states based on an additional
review of the case, they support the original review and
finding. The applicant properly incurred an ADSC for using
tuition assistance IAW Air Force policy 36-2306, Voluntary
Education. The applicant acknowledges that he fully understood
he was accepting a two-year ADSC, expiring in 2014, when he
electronically signed the AF Form 1227, Authority for Tuition
Assistance Education Services Program, indicating his
eligibility, complete understanding and acceptance of the two
year ADSC.
ADSCs are incurred individually based on specific commitment-
incurring events. Airmen can incur multiple ADSCs which are
often served concurrently and are treated independently of one
another. The applicants claim of what he might have done if
only he knew that the other ADSC would be withdrawn is
impossible to verify. The applicant knowingly accepted the
tuition assistance and it was properly applied IAW Air Force
policy.
The A1DL complete evaluation is at Exhibit F.
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 11 October 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within
15 days (Exhibit G). As of this date, no response has been
received by this office.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The
applicants contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for
our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-05203 in Executive Session on 12 December 2013,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Although chaired the panel, in view of his unavailability -
, has agreed to sign as Acting Panel Chair. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 November 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicants Available Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AF/A1DL, dated 14 January 2013.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 January 2013.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, not dated.
Exhibit F. Letter, AF/A1DL, dated 20 September 2013.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR dated 11 October 2013.
4
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04365
In support of her request the applicant provides copies of her AF Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits Statement of Understanding (SOU) and AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force (REGAF) Air Force Reserve (AF Reserve) Air National Guard (ANG). Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) who meets Post- 9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02823
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02823 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 11 Mar 11 application for transfer of her Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to her dependents be approved with an Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) date of 10 May 15. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial as there is no evidence the applicant signed the SOU in Mar 11. THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05233
* If the member has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Air Force from the date of request, regardless of the number of months transferred, or * has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either Air Force policy, DoD policy or statute from committing to four additional years (HYT,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02234
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to his best interest of the Air Force waiver he was allowed to voluntarily retire on 31 Mar 12 and able to retain his TEB benefits despite not fulfilling the agreed upon TEB Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC). In support of his appeal the applicant provides his DMDC TEB Summary from 30 May 14 and VADIR TEB Summary faxed 10 Mar 14 from Department of Veterans Affairs, indicating 31 months of his 9-11 GI-Bill benefit have been transferred to his son; a signed...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02552
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility which are included at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A1DL indicates that while they cannot add any additional information or recommendation, the appropriate response was provided in the letters from Representative Sarbanes and Senator Mikulski, both of which indicate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00319
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00319 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her debt in the amount of $1500.00 for noncompletion/failure of two college courses be waived. On 13 Nov 2012, the Air Force Military Tuition Assistance Education Services Central Office Panel determined she was not eligible for waiver of military...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03596
Because the applicant was approved for a voluntary retirement prior to the date of his TEB request, member is ineligible for TEB IAW AFI 36-2306, Attachment 9, A9.18.8.5. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation, was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Nov 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). This being the case, consistent with paragraph A9.18.1.3 of AFI 36-2306, he has served well in excess of 10 years, he is unable to accept the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01163
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01163 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 6-year Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) he incurred for completing Unmanned Aircraft Systems Undergraduate Remote Pilot Aircraft Training course be changed to 3 years. At the time of his training, no documentation was provided acknowledging a 6-year ADSC. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04770
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPANF recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. On 4 Aug 05, he signed Air Force Form 1056, Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) Contract, acknowledging that he would incur a four-year ADSC from the date he entered onto...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02875
The Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB requires: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ...